Government Reviews Jacob Zuma’s Privileges Following Meeting with Ajay Gupta

The government announced a review of former President Jacob Zuma’s privileges after his meeting with Ajay Gupta in India, accompanied by South African High Commissioner Anil Sooklal, drew sharp criticism from Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, who called the visit a “middle finger” to South Africans and an affront to the country’s criminal justice system.

Official Criticism And Privilege Review

Minister Ntshavheni, speaking at a press briefing on 3 July 2026, condemned Zuma’s actions and the role of High Commissioner Sooklal, describing their conduct as a “disgrace” that undermined both foreign policy and the rule of law. Ntshavheni stated, “This is not the first instance in relation to this particular state president that he undermines not only the foreign policy of the country but also the laws of the country.”

The Minister confirmed government’s intention to reassess benefits enjoyed by former presidents, emphasising, “Government is entitled to review such privileges if they are abused to undermine the laws of this republic.” No specific timeline was given for completing the review but the public criticism and fast-moving developments signal heightened concern at executive level.

Gupta Links And Wider Political Context

Ajay Gupta and his brothers are accused of extracting billions of rands from state contracts through corruption and undue influence over government decisions during Zuma’s presidency. The Guptas fled South Africa and have avoided prosecution, with the United Arab Emirates rejecting an extradition request in February 2023, according to official records. Zuma’s public engagement with Ajay Gupta in India was widely criticised as disregarding domestic legal processes and accountability, which remains a source of public frustration linked to unresolved state capture allegations.

The involvement of Ambassador Sooklal has intensified calls within government and civil society for accountability among diplomats and former leaders. Ntshavheni remarked, “The messaging is very wrong from Ambassador Anil Sooklal because he’s directly undermining the criminal justice system of this country and showing a middle finger to South Africans who pay his salary instead of him performing his tasks as required by the laws of this country.”

Details of the privilege review and any potential consequences for Zuma will be released after officials conclude their assessment.

en_USEnglish