An unidentified witness has applied to give in-camera testimony before the Madlanga Commission regarding the theft of 541 kilograms of cocaine from the Hawks’ offices in Port Shepstone, KwaZulu-Natal. According to court documents filed on 5 May 2026, the witness, represented by attorney Thabiso Lesufi, cited serious safety concerns for themselves and their family in seeking this exceptional measure.

Legal Basis For In-Camera Hearing

Thabiso Lesufi’s supporting affidavit stated that his client’s request for a closed-door session is motivated by ongoing threats, noting: “The witness has expressed that they are fearful of giving evidence publicly as they fear for their life and that of their family.” The Madlanga Commission, established to probe alleged criminality and corruption within South Africa’s justice system, has occasionally permitted in-camera sessions in cases where witness protection and investigative integrity outweigh the public’s right to open hearings.

The Commission’s approach differs with each application. In March 2026, when businessman Suliman Carrim applied for similar protections, Commissioner Sesi Baloyi SC rejected the bid, stating there was insufficient evidence to justify closure: “I don’t see a legal basis for it set out in your submissions.”

Precedent And Commission Protocols

Preceding this latest request, the Commission ruled in October 2025 that certain witnesses could testify remotely and off camera, with responses relayed publicly by an intermediary. Chairperson Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga explained at the time, “The witness will testify remotely and off camera. The answers of the witness to questions posed by the evidence leaders will be repeated publicly through an intermediary whose voice will be broadcast live as he or she repeats the witness’s words.”

This protocol was agreed with media organisations to balance transparency and sensitive witness protection during the inquiry’s high-profile and ongoing investigation into state corruption and law enforcement misconduct. Each application is assessed individually, considering both the potential risks to witnesses and the interests of open justice.

The Madlanga Commission is expected to issue a decision regarding the latest application before the next round of oral evidence.